Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Book Reviews: Drowning Ruth & She's Come Undone

I read two more books this past week, Drowning Ruth by Christina Schwartz and She's Come Undone by Wally Lamb.

I definitely preferred She's Come Undone because it is far more character-driven. The main character and narrator is Dolores Price, whom the book follows from childhood all the way up to adulthood, through good times, bad times, and several mental breakdowns. The book takes place between the 1950's and the 1980's, a period during which both the role of women in society and the definition of the nuclear family drastically changed, and we get to see Dolores and her mother, grandmother, and friends struggle with their own miniature versions of the cultural clashes going on all around them. Dolores's grandmother, for instance, is joyless and rigid about religion, gender roles and morality, whereas Dolores's mother carries on extra-marital affairs and dresses like Marilyn Monroe for her job as a tollbooth operator.

The men in Dolores's life are either absent or abusive, and her attempts to connect with men and find a father figure are a source of significant trauma; yet Dolores never completely gives up on love.

The best thing about the book is Dolores's voice, which is intimate, self-deprecating, funny and engaging. I found it really hard to put the book down because I liked Dolores so much I wanted to find out what happened to her.

I want to share a couple of funny quotes from the story that give a good idea of the story's tone.

The first two are from a scene where Dolores tries to get the school bully in trouble by "confessing" to her priest at Catholic school that she had seen the bully drawing dirty pictures in one of the textbooks (which she did not) and hadn't told the teacher.

"For my penance, Father Duptulski gave me ten Hail Marys, something that struck me as a reasonable punishment for an accomplice, a mere bridesmaid in crime."

I love the idea of someone being  "bridesmaid in crime."

And after Dolores leaves the confessional booth:
"I knelt and prayed, not for forgiveness - but for the accuracy of my assumptions: that the sanctity of the confessional applied more to murderers than to kids."

Of course Dolores is right; although what happens in the confessional is supposed to stay between the priest, the confessor, and God, Dolores's teacher chooses that afternoon to conduct a "textbook inspection," and the bully gets a year's worth of detention.

Another funny passage is Dolores's description of her manipulative college advisor, a "willowy redhead [who] kept her eyes at permanent half-mast indifference. It was as if Robert Mitchum had mated with an Irish setter and this...was the result."

It's interesting to hear Dolores's clever takedowns of the beautiful girls around her, especially since they treat her like a sub-human because of her appearance (she's described as obese at this point in the story). It made me wonder how many times I have looked past people who were really worth knowing, simply because something in their appearance put me off.

A lot of the reviews I read online were negative; people said they didn't like the book because it's basically just a series of bad things happening to poor Dolores. And it's true that she has more than her fair share of tragedy. But to me, that was the central theme of the book; that life is hard but you can't stop fighting.

At any rate, I would have followed Dolores through another twenty years of tragedy because I so much enjoyed hearing her voice.

Drowning Ruth was almost the polar opposite; it's a book that is totally plot driven. I didn't care about the characters, but I did want to know "what happened"; specifically, what happened one cold night when a young woman drowned in an icy lake.

The story starts with this event, and then jumps back and forth through time, eventually explaining the how and why of the young woman's death. I was interested in the story, but the author was so mysterious about the ending and delayed it for so long that I assumed there was much more to it than there actually was. I kept expecting some nefarious revelations and got kind of a "meh" story, so it was a bit disappointing.

The edition I read had an interview with the author at the end of the book, and she said that because it was her first book, and she tends to struggle with writing plots, the book ended up being MORE plot-driven than she would have liked.

Still, it will be interesting to see what else the author might have produced; I feel like it had a lot of potential, and it was a first book, after all. I am a bit surprised that it was a bestseller, but maybe that's because it was an Oprah's Book Club selection.

I don't have any quotes to share, because nothing really struck me or spoke to me. Like many plot-driven stories, the language was fairly utilitarian. I only gave it two stars.

Monday, June 19, 2017

Book Review: The Underground Railroad

Colson Whitehead's The Underground Railroad is an interesting book. For me, it wasn't a page-turner; I was able to put it down for long stretches of time and not worry about what had befallen the characters. That being said, it is a thought-provoking book with many passages of beauty and truth.

In terms of both its construction (which occasionally leaped to other characters to present a wider angle) and its dark, dog-eat-dog tone, it reminded me of The Grapes of Wrath (read my review here).

However, where The Grapes of Wrath hews closely to realism, The Underground Railroad is something more akin to magic realism as it imagines the railroad as a literal network of rails below the ground. The stops along the railroad mirror real-world ideologies, each one different, connected only by their brutality and by one defining American rule: "anything they can't take away from you is yours."

Most of the book is told from the point of view of Cora, a slave on a Georgia plantation run by the Randall brothers, whose cruelty will be familiar to those who've read slave accounts such as Frederick Douglass's.

Even among the slaves, Cora is an outsider. As a child, she was left to fend for herself when her mother Mabel ran away, leaving her alone at 8 years old to defend a beloved family garden plot from the other slaves. An older slave pulls up the garden and builds a doghouse on the plot, believing that he can take it from her because she is a child. Cora in turn destroys the doghouse and kills the dog with an ax. From that moment on, she is both undisputed owner of the plot and an outcast among her fellow slaves. This little anecdote at the beginning of story reinforces the idea that in America, anything you can hold onto is your property.

Cora eventually meets Cesar, an educated man who was taught to read by his previous mistress, but sold South to plantation life at her death. It is Cesar who asks Cora to run away, giving the excuse that since her mother was the only successful runaway in that part of Georgia, that she must be good luck. In a later chapter, narrated by Cesar, it's clear that he asks her because he has feelings for her.

Although Cora says no initially, she and Cesar do run, with a slave-catcher named Ridgeway in hot pursuit.

Ridgeway takes slave-catching extremely seriously; he imagines that each slave is his own property running away from HIM, which makes him indignant. He also is particularly hot to catch Cora, as Cora's mother is the only slave who has ever successfully evaded him.

Ridgeway's commitment to catching the slaves that he imagines are his property is grounded by a divine faith in what he calls "the American imperative." He says that the "true Great Spirit, the divine thread connecting all human endeavor" is "if you can keep it, it's yours...Your property, slave or continent...the American imperative" (80).  It's a brutal philosophy, but it's hard to deny its American-ness, especially when you strip away fancy terms like "Manifest Destiny" or "lifting up the lesser races." Manifest Destiny, explains Ridgeway, is "taking what's yours, your property, whatever you deem it to be...And everyone else taking their assigned places to allow you to take it" (221).

However, Cora refuses to take her place in Manifest Destiny; she and Cesar manage to make it to the Underground Railroad, and ride a locomotive to South Carolina.

Colson Whitehead writes South Carolina utterly unlike historical South Carolina; he imagines it as a progressive, enlightened place that initially seems like paradise.  However, it is eventually revealed as a cold, bureaucratic institution that exercises precise control over black bodies.

In South Carolina, slaves are purchased wholesale by the government to work for the government. They are paid with government scrip and live in government housing.

Cora's first government job is as a caretaker for a white family whose matriarch has a "nervous disorder" and her second is to pantomime black life for a white audience at a local museum, a job which she hates for its idyllic portrayal of slave life. While there she learns about American history, and how the land she worked for the Randalls originally belonged to Indians. "Stolen bodies working stolen land," she thinks, and likens America to an unstoppable engine whose "hungry boiler" is "fed with blood" (117). She wishes to give truth the museum's white visitors, but laments that "no one want[s] to hear it...truth [is] a changing display in a shop window" (116).

And like a display in a shop window, South Carolina is not as perfect as it appears to be. Cora and the other free black women who live off the government are required to visit a government doctor. On one such visit, the doctor encourages her to be sterilized for population control and to encourage her friends to do the same. Cora is uneasy, as she feels that sterilization is a way of "stealing futures in earnest" (117). Cora understands, instinctively, that he would never ask the same of a white woman, not even the mentally disturbed one that she works for; and the reader understands that at core, this progressive "welfare state" is only marginally more friendly to a Black American than plantation life.

Although she is uncomfortable, Cora is inclined to stay in South Carolina until she is tipped off that Ridgeway is looking for her. She is forced to run again, and takes the first train on the Railroad to North Carolina, where she finds the station empty, its entrance covered by rocks.

It turns out that the station has been caved in purposefully to hide all vestiges of the Railroad because North Carolina is a far more dangerous place than South Carolina or even the Randall plantation. In a drive for racial purity that invites comparisons to Nazism, the people of North Carolina have "solved" the problem of slavery by abolishing the black race.

Black men, women and children are hanged on discovery, and their bodies dangle for miles along the so-called "Freedom Trail" as a warning. Helping a black person is an offense punishable by death, and the people of North Carolina exist in a cycle of paranoia and mistrust, much like the climate of Nazi Germany. Neighbors and family members betray one another to the "Night Riders" who hang black people and complicit whites for sport every Friday night in the town square.

In several chapters reminiscent of Anne Frank's diary, a frightened couple hides Cora in an attic for months, before she is ratted out by the cleaning woman and given to Ridgeway.

The next significant chapter takes place in Tennessee, which Ridgeway must traverse in order to return Cora and get his bounty.

Tennessee is painted as a burned out hellscape; it has just endured a large forest fire, and is in the grips of a yellow fever epidemic. Cora travels through Tennessee chained hand and foot to a wagon, along with another escaped slave who sings old time hymns about giving your burdens to Jesus, and the wrath of God. I read these chapters as an exploration of faith as an answer to injustice.

Cora initially buys into this idea, setting down Tennessee's devastation to righteous justice, thinking, "the whites got what they deserved...for enslaving her people, for massacring another race, for stealing the very land itself" (215). But as Cora tries to apply this notion of righteous justice to her own situation, chained to a wagon, being returned to her master only to be tortured alive as a warning to other slaves, she can't understand what she did to deserve this.

She begins to notice the random indifference of the devastation; one field is burned, another escapes the fire entirely. One town is laid with fever and another isn't. Tennessee, she decides, has a "taste for arbitrary punishment" (216).

Ultimately, Cora rejects the idea that justice will come from God or from nature; she calls the devastation "indiscriminate" and "the fruit of indifferent nature, without connection to the crimes of the homesteaders" (216). And as for herself?- "No chains fastened [her] misfortunes to her character or actions...her skin was black and this is how the word treated black people" (216). As for the slave who sings constantly, crying out to God, Ridgeway eventually tires of his singing and decides he isn't worth the reward money. He shoots him point blank in the face, his blood spattering Cora. Clearly, no justice is forthcoming from above.

Although she rejects the idea of divine intervention, Cora doesn't reject the idea of goodness altogether. She focuses on the people who have been kind to her, who've helped her; in her mind, they are not "reduced to sums, but multiplied by their kindnesses" (215). And kindness is shown to her once again as she is rescued from Ridgeway by an underground railroad conductor named Royal.

Cora's last major stop on the Railway is in Indiana. Cora spends her time there on the Valentine Farm, which is owned and run by black people, for black people. It is a haven for runaway slaves as well as freed slaves and thinkers. The Valentine Farm represents a far more idyllic and peaceful place than any in the book thus far, but like all good things, it can't last. The black orators and abolitionists who meet at the farm on Saturday evenings to discuss slavery and politics know that their presence is a threat to the surrounding white farms. Not only are they a significant cultural and economic presence, but many of them are also technically stolen property (runaway slaves).

That America is a menacing machine that moves relentlessly forward, its only desire to feed itself with profit, is already well-established in the book by now, and you can almost feel it lurching toward the Valentine Farm to reclaim its property, its "breathing capital, profit made flesh" (215).  The intellectuals and orators kick around the idea of moving West to avoid violence, but unfortunately not soon enough.

The white men arrive, led by Ridgeway, and Cora is set in motion once more.

Ultimately the ending is hopeful, even though Cora is on the run once again. A brief interstitial chapter near the end of the book reveals what really happened to Cora's mother Mabel and the reason she was never caught by Ridgeway; and while a life of running is difficult, it is certainly presented as an acceptable alternative Mabel's fate.

Our last glimpse of Cora is on a wagon train heading West to California and the Gold Rush, driven once again by that great American locomotive of profit, even though she is only as a passenger, searching for a peaceful place to get off the train and stop running.




Thursday, June 8, 2017

Book Review: East of Eden by John Steinbeck


What an extraordinary book!

From its opening paragraphs, I expected East of Eden to be about the dichotomy of good vs. evil. It invokes a list of opposites right away: dry/wet, East/West, mountain/valley, birth/death.

It goes on to use Biblical binaries with two sets of brothers whose stories echo Cain and Abel (the rejected/the accepted), as well as Jacob and Esau (the loved/the hated).

And yet, the key theme of East of Eden isn't that good and evil are counter to each other but that they are possibilities that exist in all of us and over which we always have the power of choice.

Midway through its nearly 600 pages, the book records a conversation between Sam Hamilton, Lee, and Adam Trask about the Cain and Abel story as recorded in the Bible, focusing on the passage where the Lord tells Cain not to be jealous of his brother, and that if he does right, his offerings will be accepted. "But if you do not do right," the Lord continues, "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it."

Lee discusses three different translations of this, one of which is "Do thou rule over sin", which Lee interprets to be an order, another, "Thou shalt rule over sin", is interpreted by Lee to be a promise or a guarantee. But the Hebrew word, Lee says, is timshel, which means "Thou mayest."

Lee goes on to say that choice is implicit in the final translation; for if "thou mayest", then "thou mayest not." This, Lee claims, "makes a man great, that gives him stature with the gods, for in his weakness and his filth and his murder of his brother he has still the great choice...It is easy out of laziness, out of weakness, to throw oneself in to the lap of deity, saying 'I couldn't help it; the way was set.' But think of the glory of the choice!"

This emphasis on choice is reinforced in the final scene where a son begs for his father's blessing (reminiscent again of Isaac and his sons), even as he admits that he has evil within him.

The final scene got me thinking about the theme of choice woven throughout the book, and how even the most evil characters do in fact have the opportunity and ability to make good choices. Cathy for instance, who is presented as a straight-up sociopath, is nonetheless moved at the sight of her son and fantasizes about taking him to New York with her. Charles, who is brutal and jealous, the embodiment of Cain, still loves his brother Adam and their father Cyrus devotedly.

Even more interestingly, the very saintly characters, such as Adam and Aron, are actually in many ways evil because they deny others choice. Adam's love to Cathy is so consuming that he can't see who she really is, not allow her the space to reveal who she is (a condition under which he might possibly have been able to influence her). In the same way, Aron's love for Abra is conditional; she is unable to be the person she is and still have his love and acceptance because in his fantasy, she is perfect and pure, not human and fallen.

True love (and hence, true goodness) always gives a choice. After all, what meaning does love have if we are compelled to love?

In this way, true love and true goodness by their very definition create the possibility of evil. For if "thou mayest" then "thou mayest not"- and thus, the Bible answers, with the Cain and Abel story, the question of how a loving God could create a world that contains evil; and Steinbeck affirms the Bible throughout his strange, epic, beautiful work.

I will wrap up with some of my favorite passages and a follow-up reading suggestion.

"She [Liza Hamilton] had a dour Presbyterian mind and a code of morals that pinned down and beat the brains out of nearly everything that was pleasant to do."

"It was well known that Liza Hamilton and the Lord God held similar convictions on nearly every subject."

"When a child first catches adults out- when it first walks into his grave little head that adults do not have divine intelligence, that their judgments are not always wise, their thinking true, their sentences just- his world falls into panic desolation. The gods are fallen and all safety gone. And there is one sure thing about the fall of gods; they do not fall a little; they crash and shatter or sink deeply into the green muck."

"Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of a man. Nothing was every created by two men...the preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man."

"And this I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual."

"No, they kept order the only way our poor species has ever learned to keep order. We think there must be better ways but we never learn them- always the rope, the whip, and the rifle."

Follow-Up Reading:

The focus on choice (rather than on nature or circumstance) reminded me of The Story of Edgar Sawtelle. If you haven't read it, it's another great story about fathers, sons and choices. Plus it has really cool dogs.