Sunday, July 9, 2017

Book Review: Isaac's Storm

"This is the story of Isaac and his time in America, the last turning of the centuries, when the hubris of men led them to believe they could disregard even nature itself."
-Erik Larson, Isaac's Storm

I have to start by saying that I absolutely adore Erik Larson. He writes non-fiction that is gripping, page-turning delight. His book The Devil in the White City is one of my all-time favorites, and it is he (along with Jon Krakauer) who taught me to love non-fiction.

Larson's books tend to follow a pattern; he chooses an interesting, but forgotten event/era and brings it to life. He does so by focusing on the intimate details of a few lives (who become the main characters) and weaving those details in and among "big picture" descriptions of the event/era.

In Isaac's Storm the event is a devastating hurricane which nearly wiped the city of Galveston, TX off the map in 1900. Even now, 117 years later, it remains the deadliest natural disaster to have occurred on American soil.

Larson's sweeping descriptions of the storm and its aftermath are haunting. But it is in the details that Isaac's Storm doesn't quite land. Larson chooses to focus on meteorologist Isaac Cline, his brother Jacob, and a few fatuous men from the fledgling U.S. National Weather Service. He makes their stories as interesting as he possibly can, constructing the drama from old letters and telegraphs, but the story just didn't catch me. 

I think part of the problem is that Isaac Cline, as a person, seems kind of cold and reserved, and so as the sympathetic center of the book, he just didn't quite work. 

Still, the magical way that Erik Larson makes history come alive is always such a treat, and I fully enjoyed looking for further information and old pictures of the Galveston Hurricane. Any book that fires up my imagination in that way deserves at least 4 stars. 



Friday, July 7, 2017

Book Review: Famous Modern Ghost Stories edited by Dorothy Scarborough

In continuing my search for readable Gothic tales for 10th graders, I came across this collection of short stories which is in the public domain.

Famous Modern Ghost Stories, is kind of a laugh as a title. Having been published in 1921, it's hardly modern, and I hadn't heard of any of the stories in the collection, though I was familiar with some of the authors, so I would hardly say they are famous.

Apparently there's a longer version of this collection with a few stories that didn't make it into the version I read; there's a Poe story called "Ligeia" that I was missing, and another called "The Beast With Five Fingers" - I don't know why the version I read didn't include these stories.

I used to love creepy collections like this when I was younger. I checked them out from our local library and read some of them over and over again. One of them in particular contained a story called "The Toy Killer", about a mother that would destroy her son's toys, which always gave me the creeps (I think this story is the genesis of my obsession with stories about Munchausen's syndrome by proxy). I can't find the name or author of that collection, but I remember how much I loved reading horror stories, and how scared I used to be to go to the bathroom at night after reading them.

This particular collection was a little thin on real chills; there was a sweet little story about dogs waiting for their owners at the gates of heaven ("At the Gate" by Myla Jo Closser), another kind of sweet one about a ghost letting go of her former husband, and giving her blessing to his marrying her sister ("The Shell of Sense" by Olivia Howard Dunbar), and a cute story where a man puts to rest the ghost of young lovers ("The Haunted Orchard" by Richard Le Gallienne).

My hopes were high when I saw that Guy de Maupassant, author of the dark, ironic story "The Necklace", had a story in the collection. However, his story, "A Ghost", is one of the dumbest ghost stories I have ever read. Basically, the main character sees a ghost (so I guess it's aptly named) and then combs her hair. I feel like I missed something; perhaps it was written in French originally and something was lost in translation, because it seemed aimless to me.

"Lazarus" by Leonid Adreyev, is a creepy, atmospheric, zombie story that kind of touches on the same theme as Stephen King's Pet Sematary, namely, that sometimes death is more merciful than life. If you're familiar with the Bible, you will recognize Lazarus as the man Jesus raised from the dead in the book of John. This story is a meditation on what might have happened afterward. I personally thought it was a bit overlong, and it wasn't my cup of tea, but it did create a tense mood and atmosphere throughout.

The best of the collection is Algernon Blackwood's "The Willows." Although it too, suffers from being overly long (I actually skimmed the first 15-20 pages and basically missed NOTHING)- I started reading in earnest when the two main characters land on an island full of creepy willow trees and weird stuff starts to happen. If you're the type of reader who wants to know "what actually happened", (i.e., if you're the type of person who hates shows like Lost or The X-Files for not tying up all loose ends and answering all questions) then this is not the story for you. The willows are merely described as a place where the fabric between dimensions is thin and something malevolent is trying to get through from the other side.

It's a great example of a bottleneck story; the main characters are stuck on an island with a rising tide and are continually plagued by problems- losing their steering paddle, finding a hole in their canoe, etc., that keep them from leaving. This story is the longest of the collection and at 139 pages (at least in the digital version) it is really more of a novelette than a short story.

Overall, I probably wouldn't recommend this book to students who aren't experienced, high level readers. You need to be the type of reader who can expertly skim in order to get to the best parts, otherwise you will probably be bored as the pacing is certainly not ideal for modern readers.




Saturday, July 1, 2017

Book Review: The Island of Dr. Moreau

"And I know that they are neither wholly animal nor holy man, but an unstable combination of both." - H.G. Wells

I read H.G. Wells's The Island of Dr. Moreau to see if it will work for a 10th grade unit on fear and Gothic literature.

I don't ordinarily think of a sun-drenched island as a Gothic setting, but in a sense it is exotic. And it is certainly creepy! It definitely is probably more in the genre of sci-fi or even body horror, but its emphasis on the limits of science and the responsibilities of creation has lots in common with Frankenstein.

I won't say too much more because I don't want to give spoilers, but I will say that this book was readable and fun. I finished in a few hours, and I really enjoyed it. Of course, I am an X-Files fan so I love a good mad scientist story.

Wells's theme, that the line between animal and human is thin and easily crossed, could not be more on the nose, particularly at the end of the book, but it was so well-written that I really didn't mind being beaten over the head with it.

Overall, I give it 4 out of 5 stars.

********Addendum, 8/1/17 - CONTAINS SPOILERS!**********

Even on my first reading I realized that Dr. Moreau's animal/human hybrids function as stand-ins for the human race. Wells is pretty straightforward about that, and even has his narrator observe that looking at the hybrids is like seeing "the whole balance of human life in miniature, the whole interplay of instinct, reason, and fate in its simplest form." 

However, after reflecting a bit more on the book, I now have a deeper understanding of Well's ideas. I think that much like the narrator sees the hybrids, Wells sees the human race as a species constantly at war with itself.

Humanity is a mixture of the animal and the spiritual; the book of Genesis describes the creation of Adam as entirely earthly (literally, he is created from the dust) and also spiritual (he is created in the image of God). Over the years, many different terms have been coined to try to describe this internal conflict, such as "nature vs. nurture" or "duty vs. desire", but the essential idea is that man's animal self and its earthly desires (food, sex, pleasure) is constantly battling his constructed self and its spiritual desires (holiness, godliness, morality, meaning).

H.G. Wells nicely describes this never-ending battle in the scene where the hybrids recite Moreau's laws in a kind of religious fervor. Wells says that the Law "battled in their minds with the deep-seated, ever-rebellious cravings of their animal natures. This Law they were perpetually repeating, I found, and- perpetually breaking." So although the hybrids desperately want to obey the law, their animal natures won't allow it.

In Paul's letter to the Romans, he describes the condition of humanity in much the same terms: 

"So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. What a wretched man I am!"
NIV Bible, Romans 7:21-24

Like Wells, Paul describes the battle between the law and sin. (In chapter 8 of Romans, Paul goes on to exclusively name the "earthly nature" and its desires as the source of sin.

Notice too that Paul describes the wretchedness of this condition, and so too, does Wells, saying: 


 "Before [their hybridization by Moreau], they had been beasts, their instincts fitly adapted to their surrounds. Now they stumbled in the shackles of humanity, lived in a fear that never dies, fretted by a law they could not understand; their mock-human existence, begun in agony, was one long internal struggle, one long dread of Moreau--and for what? It was the wantonness of it that stirred me."
Because Moreau's hybrids can be neither fully animal, nor fully human, they are forever in limbo, unable to commit to either existence. Wells is saying that humanity is in the same sorry condition, caught in an endless tug-of-war between the earthly and the spiritual, with a desire to please God and an equally strong desire to please the animal nature. How then can the human animal ever experience peace? Wells uses words like "fret" and "agony"  and "struggle" to describe this constant state of guilt and dissonance, and even accuses a God who would create such a situation as wanton.

I see this book as a really effective critique of religion and its expectations.



Book Review: The Association of Small Bombs by Karan Mahajan

I bought this book with my Christmas money and just finished it today, which should tell you how much of a page-turner it was (not much!).

This book had some beautiful writing, some phrases that I had to stop and reread, absorb and enjoy. But overall, I just didn't get invested in the story.

The book starts in 1996, with the explosion of small bomb in Delhi. Two Hindu boys are killed in the blast, which also injures their best friend Mansoor, a young Muslim. Both sets of parents are liberals who enjoy a friendship that transcends religious boundaries, and yet their attitudes shift in the aftermath of the blast. Narration jumps from character to character as people navigate their grief; we also get to hear the story from the point of view of the bomber.

Delhi is almost a character of its own in the story; in my opinion Mahajan's descriptions of the city are among the finest passages in the book.

He describes an office building with windows so old and congealed that "they were quietly weeping light...The tables piled with fresh-smelling paper. Above all this, the enormous distant ceiling fans that shivered like the antennae of insects and patrolled the sprawling empire of paperwork with their breeze..."

And outside, in the city, "a car had broken down between two flowing gutters. Beneath it, a runway of needles, discarded by the hospital, glistened in the sunshine, the garbage ponderously overflowing, everything protected by the rusty, aggressive fragrance of the air conditioner, in whose lungs the krill of pollution stuck."

But despite these and several other lovely word clusters, I can't give this book more than three stars. It just didn't capture my interest much.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Book Reviews: Drowning Ruth & She's Come Undone

I read two more books this past week, Drowning Ruth by Christina Schwartz and She's Come Undone by Wally Lamb.

I definitely preferred She's Come Undone because it is far more character-driven. The main character and narrator is Dolores Price, whom the book follows from childhood all the way up to adulthood, through good times, bad times, and several mental breakdowns. The book takes place between the 1950's and the 1980's, a period during which both the role of women in society and the definition of the nuclear family drastically changed, and we get to see Dolores and her mother, grandmother, and friends struggle with their own miniature versions of the cultural clashes going on all around them. Dolores's grandmother, for instance, is joyless and rigid about religion, gender roles and morality, whereas Dolores's mother carries on extra-marital affairs and dresses like Marilyn Monroe for her job as a tollbooth operator.

The men in Dolores's life are either absent or abusive, and her attempts to connect with men and find a father figure are a source of significant trauma; yet Dolores never completely gives up on love.

The best thing about the book is Dolores's voice, which is intimate, self-deprecating, funny and engaging. I found it really hard to put the book down because I liked Dolores so much I wanted to find out what happened to her.

I want to share a couple of funny quotes from the story that give a good idea of the story's tone.

The first two are from a scene where Dolores tries to get the school bully in trouble by "confessing" to her priest at Catholic school that she had seen the bully drawing dirty pictures in one of the textbooks (which she did not) and hadn't told the teacher.

"For my penance, Father Duptulski gave me ten Hail Marys, something that struck me as a reasonable punishment for an accomplice, a mere bridesmaid in crime."

I love the idea of someone being  "bridesmaid in crime."

And after Dolores leaves the confessional booth:
"I knelt and prayed, not for forgiveness - but for the accuracy of my assumptions: that the sanctity of the confessional applied more to murderers than to kids."

Of course Dolores is right; although what happens in the confessional is supposed to stay between the priest, the confessor, and God, Dolores's teacher chooses that afternoon to conduct a "textbook inspection," and the bully gets a year's worth of detention.

Another funny passage is Dolores's description of her manipulative college advisor, a "willowy redhead [who] kept her eyes at permanent half-mast indifference. It was as if Robert Mitchum had mated with an Irish setter and this...was the result."

It's interesting to hear Dolores's clever takedowns of the beautiful girls around her, especially since they treat her like a sub-human because of her appearance (she's described as obese at this point in the story). It made me wonder how many times I have looked past people who were really worth knowing, simply because something in their appearance put me off.

A lot of the reviews I read online were negative; people said they didn't like the book because it's basically just a series of bad things happening to poor Dolores. And it's true that she has more than her fair share of tragedy. But to me, that was the central theme of the book; that life is hard but you can't stop fighting.

At any rate, I would have followed Dolores through another twenty years of tragedy because I so much enjoyed hearing her voice.

Drowning Ruth was almost the polar opposite; it's a book that is totally plot driven. I didn't care about the characters, but I did want to know "what happened"; specifically, what happened one cold night when a young woman drowned in an icy lake.

The story starts with this event, and then jumps back and forth through time, eventually explaining the how and why of the young woman's death. I was interested in the story, but the author was so mysterious about the ending and delayed it for so long that I assumed there was much more to it than there actually was. I kept expecting some nefarious revelations and got kind of a "meh" story, so it was a bit disappointing.

The edition I read had an interview with the author at the end of the book, and she said that because it was her first book, and she tends to struggle with writing plots, the book ended up being MORE plot-driven than she would have liked.

Still, it will be interesting to see what else the author might have produced; I feel like it had a lot of potential, and it was a first book, after all. I am a bit surprised that it was a bestseller, but maybe that's because it was an Oprah's Book Club selection.

I don't have any quotes to share, because nothing really struck me or spoke to me. Like many plot-driven stories, the language was fairly utilitarian. I only gave it two stars.

Monday, June 19, 2017

Book Review: The Underground Railroad

Colson Whitehead's The Underground Railroad is an interesting book. For me, it wasn't a page-turner; I was able to put it down for long stretches of time and not worry about what had befallen the characters. That being said, it is a thought-provoking book with many passages of beauty and truth.

In terms of both its construction (which occasionally leaped to other characters to present a wider angle) and its dark, dog-eat-dog tone, it reminded me of The Grapes of Wrath (read my review here).

However, where The Grapes of Wrath hews closely to realism, The Underground Railroad is something more akin to magic realism as it imagines the railroad as a literal network of rails below the ground. The stops along the railroad mirror real-world ideologies, each one different, connected only by their brutality and by one defining American rule: "anything they can't take away from you is yours."

Most of the book is told from the point of view of Cora, a slave on a Georgia plantation run by the Randall brothers, whose cruelty will be familiar to those who've read slave accounts such as Frederick Douglass's.

Even among the slaves, Cora is an outsider. As a child, she was left to fend for herself when her mother Mabel ran away, leaving her alone at 8 years old to defend a beloved family garden plot from the other slaves. An older slave pulls up the garden and builds a doghouse on the plot, believing that he can take it from her because she is a child. Cora in turn destroys the doghouse and kills the dog with an ax. From that moment on, she is both undisputed owner of the plot and an outcast among her fellow slaves. This little anecdote at the beginning of story reinforces the idea that in America, anything you can hold onto is your property.

Cora eventually meets Cesar, an educated man who was taught to read by his previous mistress, but sold South to plantation life at her death. It is Cesar who asks Cora to run away, giving the excuse that since her mother was the only successful runaway in that part of Georgia, that she must be good luck. In a later chapter, narrated by Cesar, it's clear that he asks her because he has feelings for her.

Although Cora says no initially, she and Cesar do run, with a slave-catcher named Ridgeway in hot pursuit.

Ridgeway takes slave-catching extremely seriously; he imagines that each slave is his own property running away from HIM, which makes him indignant. He also is particularly hot to catch Cora, as Cora's mother is the only slave who has ever successfully evaded him.

Ridgeway's commitment to catching the slaves that he imagines are his property is grounded by a divine faith in what he calls "the American imperative." He says that the "true Great Spirit, the divine thread connecting all human endeavor" is "if you can keep it, it's yours...Your property, slave or continent...the American imperative" (80).  It's a brutal philosophy, but it's hard to deny its American-ness, especially when you strip away fancy terms like "Manifest Destiny" or "lifting up the lesser races." Manifest Destiny, explains Ridgeway, is "taking what's yours, your property, whatever you deem it to be...And everyone else taking their assigned places to allow you to take it" (221).

However, Cora refuses to take her place in Manifest Destiny; she and Cesar manage to make it to the Underground Railroad, and ride a locomotive to South Carolina.

Colson Whitehead writes South Carolina utterly unlike historical South Carolina; he imagines it as a progressive, enlightened place that initially seems like paradise.  However, it is eventually revealed as a cold, bureaucratic institution that exercises precise control over black bodies.

In South Carolina, slaves are purchased wholesale by the government to work for the government. They are paid with government scrip and live in government housing.

Cora's first government job is as a caretaker for a white family whose matriarch has a "nervous disorder" and her second is to pantomime black life for a white audience at a local museum, a job which she hates for its idyllic portrayal of slave life. While there she learns about American history, and how the land she worked for the Randalls originally belonged to Indians. "Stolen bodies working stolen land," she thinks, and likens America to an unstoppable engine whose "hungry boiler" is "fed with blood" (117). She wishes to give truth the museum's white visitors, but laments that "no one want[s] to hear it...truth [is] a changing display in a shop window" (116).

And like a display in a shop window, South Carolina is not as perfect as it appears to be. Cora and the other free black women who live off the government are required to visit a government doctor. On one such visit, the doctor encourages her to be sterilized for population control and to encourage her friends to do the same. Cora is uneasy, as she feels that sterilization is a way of "stealing futures in earnest" (117). Cora understands, instinctively, that he would never ask the same of a white woman, not even the mentally disturbed one that she works for; and the reader understands that at core, this progressive "welfare state" is only marginally more friendly to a Black American than plantation life.

Although she is uncomfortable, Cora is inclined to stay in South Carolina until she is tipped off that Ridgeway is looking for her. She is forced to run again, and takes the first train on the Railroad to North Carolina, where she finds the station empty, its entrance covered by rocks.

It turns out that the station has been caved in purposefully to hide all vestiges of the Railroad because North Carolina is a far more dangerous place than South Carolina or even the Randall plantation. In a drive for racial purity that invites comparisons to Nazism, the people of North Carolina have "solved" the problem of slavery by abolishing the black race.

Black men, women and children are hanged on discovery, and their bodies dangle for miles along the so-called "Freedom Trail" as a warning. Helping a black person is an offense punishable by death, and the people of North Carolina exist in a cycle of paranoia and mistrust, much like the climate of Nazi Germany. Neighbors and family members betray one another to the "Night Riders" who hang black people and complicit whites for sport every Friday night in the town square.

In several chapters reminiscent of Anne Frank's diary, a frightened couple hides Cora in an attic for months, before she is ratted out by the cleaning woman and given to Ridgeway.

The next significant chapter takes place in Tennessee, which Ridgeway must traverse in order to return Cora and get his bounty.

Tennessee is painted as a burned out hellscape; it has just endured a large forest fire, and is in the grips of a yellow fever epidemic. Cora travels through Tennessee chained hand and foot to a wagon, along with another escaped slave who sings old time hymns about giving your burdens to Jesus, and the wrath of God. I read these chapters as an exploration of faith as an answer to injustice.

Cora initially buys into this idea, setting down Tennessee's devastation to righteous justice, thinking, "the whites got what they deserved...for enslaving her people, for massacring another race, for stealing the very land itself" (215). But as Cora tries to apply this notion of righteous justice to her own situation, chained to a wagon, being returned to her master only to be tortured alive as a warning to other slaves, she can't understand what she did to deserve this.

She begins to notice the random indifference of the devastation; one field is burned, another escapes the fire entirely. One town is laid with fever and another isn't. Tennessee, she decides, has a "taste for arbitrary punishment" (216).

Ultimately, Cora rejects the idea that justice will come from God or from nature; she calls the devastation "indiscriminate" and "the fruit of indifferent nature, without connection to the crimes of the homesteaders" (216). And as for herself?- "No chains fastened [her] misfortunes to her character or actions...her skin was black and this is how the word treated black people" (216). As for the slave who sings constantly, crying out to God, Ridgeway eventually tires of his singing and decides he isn't worth the reward money. He shoots him point blank in the face, his blood spattering Cora. Clearly, no justice is forthcoming from above.

Although she rejects the idea of divine intervention, Cora doesn't reject the idea of goodness altogether. She focuses on the people who have been kind to her, who've helped her; in her mind, they are not "reduced to sums, but multiplied by their kindnesses" (215). And kindness is shown to her once again as she is rescued from Ridgeway by an underground railroad conductor named Royal.

Cora's last major stop on the Railway is in Indiana. Cora spends her time there on the Valentine Farm, which is owned and run by black people, for black people. It is a haven for runaway slaves as well as freed slaves and thinkers. The Valentine Farm represents a far more idyllic and peaceful place than any in the book thus far, but like all good things, it can't last. The black orators and abolitionists who meet at the farm on Saturday evenings to discuss slavery and politics know that their presence is a threat to the surrounding white farms. Not only are they a significant cultural and economic presence, but many of them are also technically stolen property (runaway slaves).

That America is a menacing machine that moves relentlessly forward, its only desire to feed itself with profit, is already well-established in the book by now, and you can almost feel it lurching toward the Valentine Farm to reclaim its property, its "breathing capital, profit made flesh" (215).  The intellectuals and orators kick around the idea of moving West to avoid violence, but unfortunately not soon enough.

The white men arrive, led by Ridgeway, and Cora is set in motion once more.

Ultimately the ending is hopeful, even though Cora is on the run once again. A brief interstitial chapter near the end of the book reveals what really happened to Cora's mother Mabel and the reason she was never caught by Ridgeway; and while a life of running is difficult, it is certainly presented as an acceptable alternative Mabel's fate.

Our last glimpse of Cora is on a wagon train heading West to California and the Gold Rush, driven once again by that great American locomotive of profit, even though she is only as a passenger, searching for a peaceful place to get off the train and stop running.




Thursday, June 8, 2017

Book Review: East of Eden by John Steinbeck


What an extraordinary book!

From its opening paragraphs, I expected East of Eden to be about the dichotomy of good vs. evil. It invokes a list of opposites right away: dry/wet, East/West, mountain/valley, birth/death.

It goes on to use Biblical binaries with two sets of brothers whose stories echo Cain and Abel (the rejected/the accepted), as well as Jacob and Esau (the loved/the hated).

And yet, the key theme of East of Eden isn't that good and evil are counter to each other but that they are possibilities that exist in all of us and over which we always have the power of choice.

Midway through its nearly 600 pages, the book records a conversation between Sam Hamilton, Lee, and Adam Trask about the Cain and Abel story as recorded in the Bible, focusing on the passage where the Lord tells Cain not to be jealous of his brother, and that if he does right, his offerings will be accepted. "But if you do not do right," the Lord continues, "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it."

Lee discusses three different translations of this, one of which is "Do thou rule over sin", which Lee interprets to be an order, another, "Thou shalt rule over sin", is interpreted by Lee to be a promise or a guarantee. But the Hebrew word, Lee says, is timshel, which means "Thou mayest."

Lee goes on to say that choice is implicit in the final translation; for if "thou mayest", then "thou mayest not." This, Lee claims, "makes a man great, that gives him stature with the gods, for in his weakness and his filth and his murder of his brother he has still the great choice...It is easy out of laziness, out of weakness, to throw oneself in to the lap of deity, saying 'I couldn't help it; the way was set.' But think of the glory of the choice!"

This emphasis on choice is reinforced in the final scene where a son begs for his father's blessing (reminiscent again of Isaac and his sons), even as he admits that he has evil within him.

The final scene got me thinking about the theme of choice woven throughout the book, and how even the most evil characters do in fact have the opportunity and ability to make good choices. Cathy for instance, who is presented as a straight-up sociopath, is nonetheless moved at the sight of her son and fantasizes about taking him to New York with her. Charles, who is brutal and jealous, the embodiment of Cain, still loves his brother Adam and their father Cyrus devotedly.

Even more interestingly, the very saintly characters, such as Adam and Aron, are actually in many ways evil because they deny others choice. Adam's love to Cathy is so consuming that he can't see who she really is, not allow her the space to reveal who she is (a condition under which he might possibly have been able to influence her). In the same way, Aron's love for Abra is conditional; she is unable to be the person she is and still have his love and acceptance because in his fantasy, she is perfect and pure, not human and fallen.

True love (and hence, true goodness) always gives a choice. After all, what meaning does love have if we are compelled to love?

In this way, true love and true goodness by their very definition create the possibility of evil. For if "thou mayest" then "thou mayest not"- and thus, the Bible answers, with the Cain and Abel story, the question of how a loving God could create a world that contains evil; and Steinbeck affirms the Bible throughout his strange, epic, beautiful work.

I will wrap up with some of my favorite passages and a follow-up reading suggestion.

"She [Liza Hamilton] had a dour Presbyterian mind and a code of morals that pinned down and beat the brains out of nearly everything that was pleasant to do."

"It was well known that Liza Hamilton and the Lord God held similar convictions on nearly every subject."

"When a child first catches adults out- when it first walks into his grave little head that adults do not have divine intelligence, that their judgments are not always wise, their thinking true, their sentences just- his world falls into panic desolation. The gods are fallen and all safety gone. And there is one sure thing about the fall of gods; they do not fall a little; they crash and shatter or sink deeply into the green muck."

"Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of a man. Nothing was every created by two men...the preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man."

"And this I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual."

"No, they kept order the only way our poor species has ever learned to keep order. We think there must be better ways but we never learn them- always the rope, the whip, and the rifle."

Follow-Up Reading:

The focus on choice (rather than on nature or circumstance) reminded me of The Story of Edgar Sawtelle. If you haven't read it, it's another great story about fathers, sons and choices. Plus it has really cool dogs.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Book Review: A Sudden Country and The Grapes of Wrath

*Last month, I read two very different books about migration in the U.S. I didn't intend to do so; it happened kind of accidentally, but they complement each other well. Both are fictionalized accounts of real historical events and both feature major Westward migrations, so I thought it might be interesting to contrast them. One is the relatively unknown A Sudden Country by Karen Fisher; the other is the cultural juggernaut The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck.

I read A Sudden Country first. I saw this book reviewed in Entertainment Weekly years ago, and added it to my Amazon wish list. Lucky for me, my Amazon wish list is now so old that most of the books on it are now available in the local library. So lately I've been walking the library with my Amazon wish list pulled up on my phone searching for titles, and that's how I happened to come across this one.

Fisher's book is set during the 1847 Westward migration- just before the Gold Rush- when thousands of Americans took the Oregon trail west in covered wagons. It is the story of Lucy Mitchell, whose husband Israel (interesting that he shares a name with the wandering people of the Bible's Exodus) is obsessed with the idea of leaving his comfortable life and seeing the wild American frontier, oblivious to the dangers and to the bitterness of heart the trip is causing to his wife. Lucy's fears for her safety and that of her children are the driving force of her attraction to a fur trader, trapper and all-around survivalist named MacLaren, with whom she eventually has an affair. MacLaren has his own story; he is married to a Nez Perce woman who left him for another man, and their three children (who are half Native American) have since all died of smallpox brought west by the first migration of white people on the Oregon trail. 

This story, set on the wild, vast American frontier, is surprisingly small and intimate. It takes place almost entirely in the heads of its two leads, MacLaren and Lucy Mitchell, and is not so much a love story as a practical grown-up drama. The characters are very real; their thoughts come alive and ring with truth, but the issues presented here, such as how westward migration affected the Native populations (many of which were decimated by smallpox and other European diseases), are not touched on except as they relate intimately to the lives of the two leads. Thus the entire Westward migration and all its tragedy and triumph is a little bit reduced. Given the book's setting, I expected a grand sweeping tale as big as the untouched American plains, and got a small human drama that in many ways could have been set anywhere at any time.

The story also strangely lacks a moral center. Lucy and MacLaren have their affair and neither one seems to feel particularly bad about it- which is surprising in some ways as MacLaren himself is a cuckold whose wife has a series of men throughout the book. The theme that Fisher is trying to get across is one of "stories;" she repeatedly calls the Native Americans people who like stories, and she also refers to the "stories" (meaning the Bible) that brought the white man forward over sea and land to conquer. At the end of the book, MacLaren, held hostage by hostile Indians, tells them his story.

I think the author is trying to convey that our stories are who we are. That the stories of the Nez Pearce drive them in one direction while the stories of the Europeans (Biblical for the most part) drive them another. But to me the overall effect of the book, is that the feelings and "stories" of one person override and obscure the larger "story." Therefore Lucy's story, her bitterness against her husband and her fear of the future, justify her affair and override the big picture story of her family, her marriage, and the entire Westward migration. The book almost seems to say that our responsibility is to make ourselves happy as well as we can, when we can, and that our stories are just kind of there to get us through the night. 

Interesting that this is almost the polar opposite of the second book I read, The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. I chose this book because Kyle and I watched Ken Burns' amazing documentary on the Dust Bowl, and I was intrigued to find out that the Westward migration of 1930's actually dwarfed the Oregon Trail era migration by hundreds of thousands of people- it was truly an exodus of amazing proportions! I knew that Steinbeck's novel is the classic account of this migration so I felt compelled to read it. Plus I felt a little bit like a sham as an English teacher never having read it! (How did I miss this book and yet had to read Huckleberry Finn in three different courses?)

Whereas I felt A Sudden Country was a large story told in a small way, The Grapes of Wrath is a small story told in a big way! It is the story of the Joad family, who, like so many families of the era are reduced to share cropping on their own land because the drought and the dust storms have forced them to borrow heavily from the banks. At last, the banks decide it is more profitable to plant where the sharecroppers' houses are and kick them off the land. The Joads pack everything into a truck and migrate to California where the lure of good jobs, fertile land and fruit trees has drawn hundreds of thousands of Dust Bowl refugees. Unfortunately, California doesn't deliver all it has promised- after all, there is still a Great Depression on and fear of all the migrants taking good jobs, or going on state aid leads to unfair and unholy labor practices, ridiculously low wages, and a terrible situation for the Joads. 

This story is excellently told and drew me in masterfully. I felt the unfairness with the Joads, I was angry when they were angry, and sad when they were, and awed at the sheer meanness, and sometimes the kindness, of humanity.

But beyond the story of this one family, Steinbeck manages to create a story of and for every family that has ever lost their home, for every man who has been desperate for work, for every woman who has struggled to feed her family, and for anyone who ever raged against a hostile and unfair world. Steinbeck's interstitials- chapters that don't mention the Joads specifically but that give a kind of snapshot of the era- are part of the reason for the "big" feeling of this book. There is a chapter about the banks, their hungry and regardless drive for profit, a chapter about the used car salesmen who ripped off the migrating people with ridiculously high prices, a chapter about a waitress who watches the migration of these poor but proud folks. Their testimonies elevate the Joad's intimate and sympathetic tale into a grand opus- a symphony of whirling dust, chugging tractors, grinding gears, humming Capitalism, gnawing hunger, fierce desire. The final scene, where one of the Joads literally offers the milk of human kindness to a starving man, is the perfect final note.

The central idea of The Grapes of Wrath is that we are all beholden to each other, that we are responsible to one another. That our personal wishes and desires, our own "stories" (as Karen Fisher would say) are obscured or lost in the great big story of humanity as it struggles on- that our selves and our own families don't compare to the grandness of what is at stake in the battle for life to go on.

This is shown to us through the transformation of Tom Joad, the eldest son of the Joad clan. Throughout the book, Tom is just trying to get by. He continually does what he has to do to move himself and the family forward without thinking much beyond his next act, his next meal; he is continually telling the other characters that he is just "trying to put one foot in front of the other" and that is all he can think about. Meanwhile, his friend Casey, a former preacher, is constantly trying to get him to see the big picture; to see the forest and not just the trees, to see how his struggle connects with the struggles of those around him.

We know Tom finally "gets" it when he delivers his famous final speech, on the eve of leaving his family to fight the greater battle for the migrant workers and their rights. As his mother begs him to stay, worried that she will never see him again, Tom reassures her; "Whenever they's a fight so hungry people can eat, I'll be there. Whenever they's a cop beating up a guy, I'll be there...I'll be in the way guys yell when they're mad, and I'll be in the way kids laugh when they're hungry an' they know supper's ready. An' when our folks eat the stuff they raise, an' live in the houses they build, why, I'll be there." And just like that, Tom's struggle, which throughout the book was only to "put one foot in front of other" becomes about something bigger and more socially responsible. 

While A Sudden Country is very insightful about relationships and sometimes delightfully introspective in a Virginia Woolf kind of way, The Grapes of Wrath is at once intimate and epic, a truly astounding book and one with themes that are still relevant today. As we've watched the economy take a nosedive, and seen so many families displaced from their homes, as good paying jobs become more scarce and as anger against the banks grows, The Grapes of Wrath is just as visceral and moving a book as I imagine it was when first released.

*This book review was originally posted on my personal blog in 2007.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Book Review: Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates

“You must resist the common urge toward the comforting narrative of divine law, toward fairy tales that imply some irrepressible justice. The enslaved were not bricks in your road, and their lives were not chapters in your redemptive history. They were people turned to fuel for the American machine. Enslavement was not destined to end, and it is wrong to claim our present circumstance—no matter how improved—as the redemption for the lives of people who never asked for the posthumous, untouchable glory of dying for their children. Our triumphs can never compensate for this.” 
― Ta-Nehisi CoatesBetween the World and Me

*Warning: one of the quotes mentioned in this piece contains offensive language

In Between the World and Me, author Ta-Nehisi Coates uses his personal experiences to outline his definition of what it means to be black in America and to impart that definition to his teenage son.

Coates writes unsparingly about the greed, racism and ugliness that lies at the heart of the American Dream, and even personifies the Dream repeatedly throughout the text. The Dream, he says is "cookouts, block associations and driveways...treehouses and the Cub Scouts"; it's the anesthetizing fantasy we all long to escape to but which doesn't match the real world. The real world, says Coates, is a savage one; the American Dream, a myth that will break any body (and especially any black body) to perpetuate itself.

While unflinching in his assessment of the cost of the Dream to black America in particular, Coates is empathetic and unafraid of turning his searing questions on himself. For example, his acquaintance in college with a gay household forces him to confront his comfort with the word "faggot." "Maybe I would take another human's body to confirm myself in a community," he ruminates. "Perhaps I already had. Hate gives identity. The nigger, the fag, the bitch illuminate the border, illuminate what we ostensibly are not, illuminate the Dream of being white, or of being a Man. We name the hated strangers and are thus confirmed in the tribe."

Between the World and Me reminds me of the wisdom books of the Bible; it is full of poetic truths, genuine questions, and cautious advice. Also, like much of the Bible's wisdom, it is written in the form of a letter from a father to a son. 

The book would be a thoughtful exploration of race in America without Coates having any skin in the game, but it is Coates's vulnerability as he addresses his son that gives the book its searing, gut-punch honesty. Coates discusses "the week [his son] learned that the killers of Michael Brown would go free," saying he didn't expect an indictment. "But," he continues heartbreakingly, "you were young and still believed." 

I absolutely recommend this book to anyone who wants to wake up from an American Dream which "thrives on generalization, on limiting the number of possible questions, on privileging immediate answers" and is "the enemy of all art, courageous thinking, and honest writing."